At times attempting to pay attention to what is going on in your
local government is not unlike having a swarm of bees living in
your head. So began the recent buzzing in my brain.
It started a couple of weeks ago when the current mayor in the rotation
here in Temple City, Tom Chavez, got the bad news that his city sponsored
vacation, I mean business trip, to China had been cancelled.
He was planning on going on a currency quest to see if some foreign
investors there would like to swap some cash for permanent residency with
some EB-5 visas. EB-5 has become a very popular little program nowadays
where foreign investors with enough cash, $500,000.00 is the minimum buy
in, and the desire to live in the U.S., can work out a deal.
Tom and his councilites wanted to use the dough to kick start what is
currently called "The Gateway" formerly called "The Piazza" but will
always be known to residents in the San Gabriel Valley as "The Fiasco at
Rosemead and Las Tunas".
His council buddies said that due to the recent Wong, Wilson & Wang
scandal they weren't going to underwrite his little jaunt, for fear of
possibly perceived impropriety. City manager, Jose Pulido, voiced his
disappointment saying he hoped that the cash would help them start the
Fiasco, I mean the Gateway construction at the same time they would be
starting the demolition and alleged beautification of Rosemead Boulevard.
Say what? Okay I'll get back to that in a minute. Let me get you caught
up on the China excursion first.
In what I personally view as kind of an odd turn of events, Randy "I
Couldn't Build A House Of Cards If My Life Depended On It" Wang who was
at the heart of the scandal that sent Cathe Wilson and Judy Wong to
prison and is the one that has been holding the corner of Las Tunas and
Rosemead hostage, is paying for a couple of members of the Temple City
chamber of commerce to go with him to China.
Talk about your perceived impropriety. They may not be city employees,
but I have a funny feeling that the potential investors they are going
after may get the impression that they are. Just call me suspicious, but
I can hear the excuse "lost in translation" being used somewhere down the
line when future litigation is being discussed.
Now back to the construction double dipping on Rosemead Boulevard that
city manager Pulido was referring to.
Back in October I made a call to city hall to ask a couple of questions
on the "proposed" modifications to Rosemead Boulevard, the street on
which I live. I had received a flyer about a meeting that invited
residents to share their concerns about the "proposed" renovations. The
artist rendering shown on the flyer included solid medians full of trees,
shrubberies, and faceless people walking and riding bicycles.
What I wanted to know was, if there was a median in front of my driveway
that would prevent me, or anyone else, from making left turns in or out
of their driveways and businesses.
The answer was, of course, yes.
The people on the committee that I spoke to, Kristi and Steve, sent me
straight to the top. Via e-mail, they hooked me up with council member
and head of the committee, Carl Blum, with the requisite cc's to council
member Vince Yu and city manager Jose Pulido.
Carl was quick on the e-mail draw. In part he stated the following: "I
understand the concern you brought up and will add it to the comments we
will receive at Thursday's meeting. We will evaluate the input we get
and will determine what adjustments we feel need to be made to the
proposed design. We will probably not finish that process until late
October. We will get back to you at that time."
His email made me feel special and that my concerns mattered. The council
would see what a burden their plans would be for me and my neighbors.
They would find a way to modify their plans to please their citizens.
I can be such an idealistic fool sometimes, and this was one of them.
When the time frame ol' Carl had specified had come and gone I started to
smell something foul. I shot him off an e-mail to see if he and his
buddies had found their erasers yet.
Carl's response?: "While it would cause some minor inconvenience to
those living on the east side of the 5100 block of Rosemead Blvd who
might wish to travel south on Rosemead Blvd, they would be able to travel
north for a short distance to Sereno and then loop around to Sultana and
then to Pentland and enter Rosemead Blvd to go south at the traffic
signal at Pentland or they could go a little further north and make a
u-turn at the traffic signal at Broadway. It would be no different than
for those who live along the many miles of wider more heavily traveled
roadways that already have medians (including much of Rosemead Blvd,
Huntington Drive, Santa Anita Dr., and Baldwin Ave as examples)."
I learned two things from his response. First, it confirms my long held
belief that they put hallucinogens in the water at city hall. Second, I
now know what classifies as a "minor inconvenience" in the eyes of the
current city council.
I wonder what they would call it if someone put a barrier in front of
their house preventing them from making a left turn in or out of their
driveway? Somehow I don't think the word "minor" would be involved.
A few questions popped into my spinning head as I read his email. Who
decided that the 17 million dollars available for this project should be
spent on this? Why, just because mistakes were made on Rosemead,
Huntington and Baldwin, should we repeat them?
And the biggest why of all? Why would anybody think it would be a good
idea to begin two major construction projects on the same street at the
same time? Isn't this something that the residents in the city, if not
all the surrounding cities, should be deciding on? Or don't you care what
kind of traffic nightmare you would be causing for all of our neighbors?
Oh that's right, I forgot, it would only be a minor inconvenience. Kind
of like having bees living in your head.
